In a recent release American Girl wowed us with this cute as little outfit, Kit's Play Dress.
I had thought from the stock picture the dress fell just above knee, and the socks just below. From an angle looking down it's no problem but straight on there is a good inch clearance between the hem and where I hoped the dress fell.
Maybe like this
Oh, Kitten is taller in torsoe than Llewellyn
There you go mystery solved. I have a tall Kit.
Kitten's body tag is smaller and has 2006 on it. Llewellyn has two but no year. Definitely different bodies.
Welcome to the slightly stockier clan. Miriam (#30) on the left is my tallest doll. She has a body tag like Kitten's. Zara (#4) in the middle has no tag at all, if her undies are her original she is a 2000-2002 model, she has the widest cloth body of my girls.
1930s dresses for girls could be what we would consider extremely short. Think Shirley Temple. Although I don't know if a girl Kit's age, nine to ten years old, would still be wearing dresses that short.
ReplyDelete